Biomass industry leaders converge on Denver

By Anna Austin | April 17, 2012

Nearly 1,300 gathered at the International Biomass Conference & Expo held in Denver, Colo., April 16-19, to hear leaders of biomass industry sectors discuss current challenges, opportunities and goals.
During the general session discussion “Director’s Roundtable: Priorities for Industry Growth in an Election Year,” Gary Melow, Biomass Power Association state projects coordinator, gave an overview of the biomass power industry’s history, pointing out that things have changed dramatically for producers over the years. He also explained how the industry got where it is today.

Read more:http://www.biomassmagazine.com/articles/6276/biomass-industry-leaders-discuss-priorities-challenges

About Megadude

Forester,educator, urban composter and associate professor. Attended first Earth Day @ 10 years of age, Central Park N.Y. Attended lectures of Richard Leakey and Margaret Meade in teens. Graduate work in biomass (nutrient and energy content of native hardwoods) early 80's
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

One comment on “Biomass industry leaders converge on Denver

  1. Monique on said:

    Searchinger’s debate paentrr agreed that we need this fix: I can state without qualification that I agree with the premise of Tim’s recent article that there is a major flaw in current and proposed accounting systems for carbon. Electric cars are a case of which comes first, the chicken or the egg? Should we wait for low carbon electricity before building electric cars, and will electric cars create a demand for low carbon electricity? It is a moot point because, from a global warming perspective, if we don’t get rid of coal, it won’t matter what you drive. whether his models can show They are not all his models. Attempts to single out and make an example out of one researcher by publicly denigrating him is starting to backfire. This isn’t a one man show, not by any stretch of the imagination: ..Roughly a dozen major scientific assessments have now noted that because any use of productive land to produce biofuels has a high risk of creating large emissions through land-use change, we shouldn’t be pursuing that route. Among these studies are those by our National Academy of Sciences, SCOPE, a special U.K. government review of biofuels called the Gallagher Report, Dutch reviews, and studies by the Joint Research Centre of the European Union.