{"id":17129,"date":"2022-06-13T10:53:00","date_gmt":"2022-06-13T14:53:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cnr.ncsu.edu\/geospatial\/?p=17129"},"modified":"2023-12-06T01:18:37","modified_gmt":"2023-12-06T06:18:37","slug":"walkable-green-environments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cnr.ncsu.edu\/geospatial\/news\/2022\/06\/13\/walkable-green-environments\/","title":{"rendered":"Study: People Are Most Physically Active When Their Environments are Both Highly Walkable and Very Green"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n\n\n

Many Americans still struggle to get their daily steps in, despite the physical and emotional benefits of walking as part of a healthy lifestyle. Where a person spends their day, however, can influence the likelihood that they will engage in moderate to vigorous exercise, according to a new study<\/a> co-authored by researchers from North Carolina State University.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The analysis, led by former NC State postdoctoral scholar Oriol Marquet, used wearable sensors and satellite data to link people\u2019s activity levels with the walkability and greenness of where they spent their time. \u201cWalkability\u201d accounts for factors like street intersection density and mix of land uses, while \u201cgreenness\u201d is an indicator of the abundance of vegetation in an area. In 2012 or 2013, 354 working female adults from four sites across the United States each wore a GPS unit (which recorded a location every 15 seconds) and an accelerometer (which recorded movement and total number of steps taken) for one week. Researchers then mapped participants\u2019 \u201cactivity spaces\u201d and measured walkability and greenness within them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Study participants who spent their time in places that were both very walkable and very green exhibited the highest levels of moderate to vigorous physical activity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cTo me, the most interesting thing is the interaction between walkability and greenness,\u201d says Aaron Hipp<\/a>, co-author of the study and Associate Director of Social and Behavioral Science Applications at NC State\u2019s Center for Geospatial Analytics. \u201cIt\u2019s intuitive\u2013\u2013having places to walk to, with sidewalks that are shaded by trees. But it\u2019s really rare to get both. A lot of places are walkable and urban, with few trees, or places are really green but they lack sidewalks, or nearby destinations like schools, work, parks, places to get coffee, groceries. It\u2019s unfortunately rare to live or work in a neighborhood that has the walking infrastructure like sidewalks, destinations like a spot for lunch, and are green and shaded. This work again supports that the best environments have all three.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Previous studies had examined the characteristics of residential neighborhoods to draw connections between physical activity and people\u2019s environments, but this new study used wearable sensors (GPS units and accelerometers) to track activity across all of the environments encountered throughout a person\u2019s day. The new findings suggest that having opportunities to walk between home, work and other destinations is likely to boost physical activity, as long as those areas are also very green.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If urban planners, landscape architects, and policy makers are interested in encouraging people to get more exercise during the day, the researchers say, \u201cinterventions to plant vegetation should focus on doing so in areas where walkability is high to maximize opportunities for physical activity.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The study<\/a>, \u201cGPS-based activity space exposure to greenness and walkability is associated with increased accelerometer-based physical activity,\u201d was published in Environment International and co-authored by researchers from the Autonomous University of Barcelona, Drexel University, University of California San Diego, Beckman Research Institute, Children\u2019s Hospital of Philadelphia, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Brigham and Women\u2019s Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute.<\/p>\n","protected":false,"raw":"\n\n\n\n\n

Many Americans still struggle to get their daily steps in, despite the physical and emotional benefits of walking as part of a healthy lifestyle. Where a person spends their day, however, can influence the likelihood that they will engage in moderate to vigorous exercise, according to a new study<\/a> co-authored by researchers from North Carolina State University.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The analysis, led by former NC State postdoctoral scholar Oriol Marquet, used wearable sensors and satellite data to link people\u2019s activity levels with the walkability and greenness of where they spent their time. \u201cWalkability\u201d accounts for factors like street intersection density and mix of land uses, while \u201cgreenness\u201d is an indicator of the abundance of vegetation in an area. In 2012 or 2013, 354 working female adults from four sites across the United States each wore a GPS unit (which recorded a location every 15 seconds) and an accelerometer (which recorded movement and total number of steps taken) for one week. Researchers then mapped participants\u2019 \u201cactivity spaces\u201d and measured walkability and greenness within them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Study participants who spent their time in places that were both very walkable and very green exhibited the highest levels of moderate to vigorous physical activity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cTo me, the most interesting thing is the interaction between walkability and greenness,\u201d says Aaron Hipp<\/a>, co-author of the study and Associate Director of Social and Behavioral Science Applications at NC State\u2019s Center for Geospatial Analytics. \u201cIt\u2019s intuitive\u2013\u2013having places to walk to, with sidewalks that are shaded by trees. But it\u2019s really rare to get both. A lot of places are walkable and urban, with few trees, or places are really green but they lack sidewalks, or nearby destinations like schools, work, parks, places to get coffee, groceries. It\u2019s unfortunately rare to live or work in a neighborhood that has the walking infrastructure like sidewalks, destinations like a spot for lunch, and are green and shaded. This work again supports that the best environments have all three.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Previous studies had examined the characteristics of residential neighborhoods to draw connections between physical activity and people\u2019s environments, but this new study used wearable sensors (GPS units and accelerometers) to track activity across all of the environments encountered throughout a person\u2019s day. The new findings suggest that having opportunities to walk between home, work and other destinations is likely to boost physical activity, as long as those areas are also very green.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If urban planners, landscape architects, and policy makers are interested in encouraging people to get more exercise during the day, the researchers say, \u201cinterventions to plant vegetation should focus on doing so in areas where walkability is high to maximize opportunities for physical activity.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The study<\/a>, \u201cGPS-based activity space exposure to greenness and walkability is associated with increased accelerometer-based physical activity,\u201d was published in Environment International and co-authored by researchers from the Autonomous University of Barcelona, Drexel University, University of California San Diego, Beckman Research Institute, Children\u2019s Hospital of Philadelphia, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Brigham and Women\u2019s Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute.<\/p>\n"},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

New research used wearable sensors and satellite data to identify how a person’s environment affects their level of daily exercise.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":119,"featured_media":17130,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"source":"","ncst_custom_author":"","ncst_show_custom_author":false,"ncst_dynamicHeaderBlockName":"ncst\/default-post-header","ncst_dynamicHeaderData":"{\"showAuthor\":true,\"showDate\":true,\"showFeaturedVideo\":false,\"caption\":\"Image: Gordon Chaffin\/Unsplash\",\"displayCategoryID\":7}","ncst_content_audit_freq":"","ncst_content_audit_date":"","footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[7,51,8,13,44,46],"tags":[],"displayCategory":{"term_id":7,"name":"Faculty and Staff","slug":"faculty-and-staff","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":7,"taxonomy":"category","description":"","parent":0,"count":131,"filter":"raw"},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cnr.ncsu.edu\/geospatial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17129"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cnr.ncsu.edu\/geospatial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cnr.ncsu.edu\/geospatial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cnr.ncsu.edu\/geospatial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/119"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cnr.ncsu.edu\/geospatial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17129"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/cnr.ncsu.edu\/geospatial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17129\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20713,"href":"https:\/\/cnr.ncsu.edu\/geospatial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17129\/revisions\/20713"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cnr.ncsu.edu\/geospatial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17130"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cnr.ncsu.edu\/geospatial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17129"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cnr.ncsu.edu\/geospatial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17129"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cnr.ncsu.edu\/geospatial\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17129"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}