Canopy Gaps Help Eastern Hemlock Outlast Invasive Insect

A new study finds that creating physical gaps in the forest canopy give eastern hemlocks more access to resources and help those trees withstand infestation by an invasive insect. The approach adds another tool to the toolkit that foresters can use to protect these trees.

Eastern hemlocks are an ecologically important tree species found from eastern Canada to the Great Lakes states and south along the entire Appalachian mountain range. The hemlock woolly adelgid – an invasive insect that was introduced to North America 70 years ago and has spread along the East Coast – can kill a hemlock tree in as little as four years.

“An integrated pest management strategy is the best approach in cases like this,” says Robert Jetton, associate professor of forest health at North Carolina State University and study co-author. “Integrated pest management utilizes multiple tactics to combat insect pests and can include chemical insecticides, seed preservation, biological control, and silviculture, or managing the surrounding forest.

“This study focused on silviculture. Is there a way to actively manage a forest to improve the health of eastern hemlocks?”

The study began in 2017. Jetton and colleagues from the U.S. Department of Agriculture selected 105 eastern hemlock trees in national and state forests along the Appalachians from Maryland to Georgia. They created small or large canopy gaps around the trees by either felling or girdling the competing trees. Felling is cutting down the tree outright, while girdling refers to killing the tree by removing its access to nutrients, but not cutting it down.

The gaps around the hemlocks ranged in size from .05 to .15 acre. Small gaps were created by felling or girdling any competing tree that overlapped the hemlock’s outermost branches, or dripline. For large gaps, they created a radius around the hemlock that was equal to the dripline plus 25% of the average tree height in the stand.

For comparison, the researchers also monitored a control group which consisted of hemlocks that didn’t have canopy gaps created around them.

The researchers collected data on the trees every six months from late 2017 through early 2021. One tree had died (due to another tree falling on it), but overall, even though all of the “canopy gap” trees in the study were infested with woolly adelgid, their health had substantially improved. By comparison, the health of the control trees continued to decline.

“The major benefit of the treatment is that the trees’ crown health improved, especially in areas where we did the large fell,” Jetton says. “Crown health refers to the tree’s foliage – its color and density. With all four gap treatments, we saw that the trees continued to produce new shoot growth annually, though this effect was greatest in the large fells. This is good news because woolly adelgids feed on branch tips, so one of the first effects of infestation is that the tree stops producing new growth.”

While the treatment’s effectiveness varied by region – it was more effective in the southernmost sites (North Carolina, Georgia and Tennessee) – the researchers believe the results are encouraging.

“The canopy gaps give the trees better access to resources like water and nutrients that help them deal with the adelgid,” Jetton says. “While it doesn’t cause the adelgid population to decrease, it may be giving trees the ability to ‘outgrow’ the insect’s impact, at least temporarily.”

The study is ongoing, and the researchers plan to focus on stands of hemlocks, rather than single trees, next.

“Our study was conducted in forests where hemlocks occurred under a canopy of primarily hardwood trees, which lose their leaves in fall and winter,” says Albert Mayfield, entomologist with the USDA Forest Service and study co-author. “So, the response of hemlocks to canopy gaps might be different in pure hemlock forests, where there is more year-round shade. But our sites were very typical of the southern Appalachian forests, where hemlock trees are usually mixed with hardwood trees.”

“We see silviculture as part of the overall pest management strategy,” says Jetton. “Hopefully it will benefit biological control efforts by allowing the adelgid’s predators to establish populations, and it may decrease our use of chemicals. But the bottom line is this study shows silviculture is another tool in the toolkit to increase the survival rate of eastern hemlocks.”

The study appears in Forest Ecology and Management and was supported by the USDA Forest Service Special Technology Development Program. Albert Mayfield of the USDA Forest Service is corresponding author. NC State research associate Andy Whittier, and USDA Forest Service members Bryan Mudder, Tara Keyser, and James Rhea, also contributed to the work.

-peake-

Note to editors: An abstract follows.

“Silvicultural canopy gaps improve health and growth of eastern hemlocks infested with Adelges tsugae in the southern Appalachian Mountains”

DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121374

Authors: Albert E. Mayfield III, Bryan T. Mudder, Tara L. Keyser, James R. Rhea, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture; Robert M. Jetton, William A. Whittier, North Carolina State University
Published: Aug. 28, 2023 in Forest Ecology and Management

Abstract:
The hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA, Adelges tsugae Annand) is an invasive forest insect threatening the sustainability of eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carri`ere) in eastern North America. In this study, cutting small gaps in the forest canopy above understory eastern hemlocks was evaluated as a potential tool for use in the integrated pest management of HWA. Two gap sizes and two gap creation methods (felling vs. girdling trees) were assessed for effects on HWA density, hemlock crown health, hemlock growth, and regeneration of competing tree species, at three different latitude groups in the southern Appalachian Mountains. In all three latitude groups, the treatment that removed the most canopy competition (Large Fell) increased the production of new hemlock shoots, reduced the percentage of dead shoots, and increased basal area increment of target hemlocks relative to unreleased trees. Smaller gaps and those that removed fewer competing live trees (Girdle treatments) also improved hemlock health in the southernmost latitude group. Positive effects of canopy gaps on hemlock crown condition and growth occurred despite similar or higher HWA densities on gap-released vs. unreleased trees. In regression analysis, more than half the variability in crown transparency change and basal area growth post-treatment was explained by the competition index of live trees remaining, average HWA density index, and tree size (dominant tree height and hemlock dbh). In the southernmost latitude group, the regeneration density of deciduous species increased significantly in the three years following gap creation and were highest in the Large Fell treatment. Results support the hypothesis that the increased availability of sunlight (and possibly other limited resources) resulting from canopy gaps (radius approximately ¼ to ½ dominant tree height) improves the physiological tolerance of eastern hemlock to HWA infestation and could complement biological control by providing a more stable source of new shoots with adelgid prey for predatory insects.